Shayan Ali, a fervent supporter of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party in the United Kingdom, responds to being charged under Pakistan’s anti-terror law. The case stems from purportedly harassing Islamabad Additional District and Sessions Judge Humayun Dilawar in Hull, England.

During a human rights event at Hull University, Judge Humayun Dilawar, who sentenced ex-PM Imran Khan, faced an incident. During his visit, he was reportedly targeted by supporters of PTI, leading to a contentious situation.

The Islamabad police promptly filed a case against Shayan Ali at the Ramna Police Station. The FIR disclosed that Ali filmed videos of the judge in London, resulting in allegations of harassment. These actions were supposedly evident from multiple videos circulating on social media platforms.

In response, Shayan Ali strongly contested the accusations, asserting that he was exercising his right to freedom of speech and expression against Judge Dilawar. 

Furthermore in a social media video, Ali questioned, “Will Islamabad Police arrest me in London?” He’s puzzled about FIR filed abroad.

Additionally, Shayan Ali emphasized the FIR’s English language, fearing its impact on his UK academic pursuits. He’s deeply concerned about how terrorism allegations could impact his life.

Ali’s perspective hinges on his interpretation of human rights safeguards, citing ECHR Articles 10 and 11 and HRA 1998. He underscores that such expressions are not classified as terrorism in the UK but rather as fundamental human rights.

This case highlights the intricate interplay of legal dynamics across borders, addressing jurisdiction, freedom of expression, and global legal convergence.